Legal Opinion
Lansberry v. Carbide/Graphite Group, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 27, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 22, 2004, which ruled that claimant’s schedule loss of use award is not subject to an award to claimant in another workers’ compensation case.
Claimant suffered a compensable back injury in July 2002. In a decision filed in May 2003, he was awarded the maximum benefit of $400 per week upon his claim for workers’ compensation.benefits. Claimant remained unable to return to work, and the record reveals that he continued to receive payments on that award through most of 2004. In July 2003, claimant submitted a separate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Claim of Wilkosz v. Symington Gould Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Claim of Wilkosz v. Symington Gould Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1964
- In re the Claim of Miller v. North Syracuse Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Soper v. Gouverneur Talc Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Claim of Kaminski v. Mohawk Carpet Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Claim of Lamantia v. Midland Elevator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Schmidt v. Falls Dodge, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Schmidt v. Falls Dodge, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2012