Houston v. Phillips
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
1. Where property of a deceased person has been set. apart, in conformity with the statute, as a year’s support for the widow and minor children of the deceased, such property can not be sold at sheriff’s sale under a fi. fa. based on a common-law judgment against the widow, based on a debt of the -widow that wa-S pot created for the support and maintenance of the family,
*345No. 4412. December 12, 1924. W. I. Geer and P. Z. Geer, for plaintiffs in error. E. E. Cox, contra.
2. Where tlie widow knows that sueli property lias been levied upon and advertised for sale by tlie sheriff, under a fi. fa.…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Walden v. WaldenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Rimes v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Dalmon Davis, District Director of Internal Revenue, and I. W. Spillers, Revenue Officer v. Mrs. Bertha S. BirdsongCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Grant v. SosebeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Pickron v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.