Legal Opinion

United States v. Casey

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 11, 1918No. 976PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Thomas Casey and others were indicted for conspiracy to violate Selective Service Act May 18, 1917, § 13, and the regulation of the Secretary of War promulgated in pursuance of that section, by keeping and setting up a house of ill fame within five miles of a military post or station used for military purposes. On motion to quash and demurrer.

1Opinion of the Court

SATER, District Judge.

The indictment charges that Casey and others, on or about July 31, 1917, knowingly, willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously entered into a conspiracy, which continued down to November 5th, to violate section 13 of the Selective Service Act of M.ay 18, 1917, and the regulation of the Secretary of War promulgated in pursuance of that section, by keeping and setting up a house of ill fame, bawdyhouse, and brothel within five miles of the military post or station used for military purposes and known as the Columbus Barracks, and by receiving and permitting to be received at…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Gloucester Ferry Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. State v. BolenWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. In re GuerraSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
  4. Cooley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  5. Bryson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API