Legal Opinion

DEVORE ASSOCIATES, LLC v. Sorkin

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 22, 2011No. AC 31943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The principal issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly denied the motion of the defendant, Alan M. Sorkin, to open the judgment granting the application to compel arbitration filed by the plaintiff, Devore Associates, LLC, and defaulting the defendant for his failure to appear at the scheduled hearing on that application. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The trial court set forth the following facts and procedural history, which are relevant to this appeal in ruling on the defendant’s motion. “[The plaintiffs] application to compel arbitration . . . claims that…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Trichilo v. TrichiloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. PumphreyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  3. Wilkinson v. Boats Unlimited, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Triton Associates v. Six New Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  5. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. WaterfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weinstein & Wisser v. CorneliusConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API