Legal Opinion

Robinson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 23, 1981No. Nos. 80-1937, 80-2149PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgments of conviction upon a holding that (1) the prosecutor’s comment, “We have shown it beyond a reasonable doubt, since there wasn’t one statement from that witness stand that conflicted with that conclusion,” addressed the evidence as it existed before the jury, not the defendant’s failure to testify, and was therefore within permissible bounds, State v. Jones, 204 So.2d 515 (Fla.1967); White v. State, 348 So.2d 368 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); and (2) defendant’s contention that the evidence of concealment was insufficient to support a conviction on the count charging him with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  2. White v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Daley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Oliver v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. V. J. T. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Carrero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API