Legal Opinion

United States v. Bridget M. Mandelbaum

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 24, 1986No. 86-1079PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GENE CARTER, District Judge.

The appellant, Bridget M. Mandelbaum, was convicted by a jury of theft of government property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. Appellant was acquitted on four counts of willfully making false statements on applications for housing benefits in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Appellant argues that prosecutor’s statement to the jury using the words “Do your duty and return a verdict of guilty” constituted reversible error. We conclude that although the prosecutor’s exhortation was improper, it did not cause substantial prejudice warranting reversal.

The government’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. Donald Kenneth CurrensCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  4. United States v. John R. Dorr and John Grant PassmoreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Raymond Patriarca v. United States of America, Ronald J. Cassesso v. United States of America, Henry Tameleo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. SinghSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. United States v. WihbeyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. Evans v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  4. United States v. ManningCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API