Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 16, 1993No. A93A0113PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge.

Richard David Bailey appeals from his convictions of rape, aggravated sodomy and child molestation.

1. Bailey contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for discharge and acquittal because he was not tried within the time required by his statutory demand for trial. Since Bailey was charged in a multi-count indictment with the capital offense of rape along with several noncapital offenses, the time limit within which he had to be tried upon his proper demand is that set forth in OCGA § 17-7-171 for the more serious offense. Cleary v. State, 258 Ga. 203, 205 (366…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Stevens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  4. Gilstrap v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  5. Burney v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Herring v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Wilkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. Gentry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Brownlow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API