Legal Opinion

Phelps v. Varbel

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 11, 1956No. 48993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWennerstrum, J.

Plaintiff’s action is one to renew a judgment which originally had been entered on January 12, 1924. Section 11007, 1939 Code, 614.1(7), 1954 Code. Several defenses were made in this subsequent proceeding. The rulings concerning them in connection with preliminary motion, motions during the trial, as well as a directed verdict in favor of the plaintiff at the conclusion of all the evidence, are the bases of the present appeal. The present plaintiff is a claimed assignee and heir of the original judgment holder. The defendants have appealed from the judgment entered against them.

The original…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Des Moines Union Railway Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  2. Priestman v. PriestmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Dallas v. DallasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  4. Hammon v. GilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  5. Kiser v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Windus v. Great Plains GasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  2. Abell v. HowatSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API