Legal Opinion
Krall v. Forney
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 15, 1897No. Appeal, No. 551PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal, No. 551, Jan. T., 1896, by-defendants, from decree of C. P. Lebanon Co., Equity Docket 1894, No. 2, on bill in equity. Bill in equity for a partnership accounting. Before EhrGOOD, P. J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned among others was decree in favor of the plaintiff.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Dean,
On November 13, 1889, Jacob Forney, Samuel E. Fox, Atkins & Brother and John Krall, this plaintiff, as parties of the first part, the other three of them being these defendants, and *9Aaron Brubacher, as party of the second part, entered into an agreement as follows:
“ The said parties of the first part agree to employ the said Brubacher to carry on the butchering business at his shop in Cornwall Township, Lebanon County, Pa., hereby constituting and appointing him as their agent, and agree to advance him money for said purpose as may be required, no.t exceeding two…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gibbs's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Walker v. TupperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kaufmann v. KaufmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Frazier v. MansfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931