Legal Opinion

McFall v. Iowa Central Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 16, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Mahaska District Court. — Hon. A. E. Dewey, Judge. Action to recover damages for a personal injury. Jury trial. Verdict for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, C. J.

I. It is without dispute that plaintiff was employed by the defendant company as a brakeman on its line of railway extending from Peoria, 111., to Oskaloosa, Iowa; that on Janluary 8, 1893, at Keithsburg, 111., and while in the performance of his duty in coupling cars, his hand was so mangled and crushed between the bumpers of some cars that it became necessary to amputate it. The negligence charged is in not furnishing a reasonably safe place for the plaintiff to work, and in negligently permitting its water tank to become out of repair, whereby the water was permitted to run on and over its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meyer v. HouckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  2. McFall v. Iowa Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lawson v. FordyceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  2. Engen v. Rambler Copper & Platium Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API