Legal Opinion
Holland v. Consol Energy Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 29, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2020-1148Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHAEL H. HOLLAND et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 20-1148 (TJK) CONSOL ENERGY INC. et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, trustees of the United Mine Workers of America 1992 Benefit Plan, sued eight energy-industry companies under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act of 1992—the Coal Act, for short. In their operative complaint, Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment that these com- panies are not fulfilling several of their obligations under the Coal Act and must do so. Defendants move to…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.