Legal Opinion
United States v. Podell
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 30, 1977No. 76 Civ. 509PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, District Judge.
The government has moved for summary judgment in this action which seeks to recover $41,350 allegedly paid defendant, a former United States Congressman, in violation of the federal conflict of interests statute, 18 U.S.C. § 203, prohibiting a member of Congress during his incumbency to receive compensation for services rendered with respect to any matter in which the United States has a direct and substantial interest before any department or agency. 1 It is the government’s position that receipt of these monies in violation of § 203…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Bertram L. PodellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Town of Nantucket v. BeineckeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- United States v. Joseph F. Kenealy, Anna M. Kenealy, Michael F. Kenealy, Manor Mortgage Co., Inc., and Kenco Realty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Kraftsman Container Corp. v. FinkelsteinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978
- McMillan v. Marine Sulphur Shipping Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.