Legal Opinion

Anderson v. McNeely

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 25, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Julia A. McKeely, from an order of the Oounty Court of Sullivan county, entered in the office of the cleric of said county on the 8th day of April, 1907, directing a judgment of foreclosure in favor of the plaintiffs upon the ground that the answer of the defendant Julia A. McKeely is frivolous.

1Opinion of the Court

Roosa, J.:

This is a motion to strike out the answer as frivolous. The action is brought to foreclose a mortgage made and executed by Archibald I. McKeely to the plaintiffs. •

Julia A. McKeely, the wife of Archibald I. McKeely, did not. sign the mortgage. The motion of - the plaintiffs is for judgment upon the pleadings, upon the ground that the answer does not deny any of the allegations of the complaint, nor contain any defense valid at law, and is, therefore, frivolous.

The application .is made for judgment - under section 537 of the Code of Civil Procedure. A frivolous answer denies no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Merchants' Bank v. . ThomsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Fern v. OsterhoutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. Hull v. SmithThe Superior Court of New York City · 1852
  5. Soper v. St. Regis Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tax Lien Co. v. . SchultzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Jasper v. . RozinskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Clark v. FullerNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Second National Bank of Cooperstown v. CalvertNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Hildenbrand v. RuckertNew York Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API