Inpetco, Inc. v. Texas American Bank/Houston N.A.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DRAUGHN, Justice.
Appellants seek reversal of a summary judgment rendered against them. In their single point of error, appellants assert that because genuine issues of material fact exist this court must reverse the trial court and remand the case for a trial on the merits. We find that appellants have failed to properly allege, brief, or support by argument their point of error in accord- anee with Rule 414 1 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and have therefore waived their point of error. Accordingly we affirm the judgment.
To obtain judicial review, one must comply with the rules…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bellefonte Underwriters Ins. Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Nolan v. BettisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Richardson v. Office Bldgs. of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Daniels v. Shop Rite Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Blackburn v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Bar of Texas v. EvansTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Inpetco, Inc. v. Texas American Bank/Houston N.A.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- King v. Graham Holding Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Shivers v. Texaco Exploration & Production, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
- Evans v. State BarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.