Legal Opinion

Pidcock v. Swift

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On final hearing on bill and answers and proofs taken orally.-

1Opinion of the Court

Van Fleet, V. C.

Two questions are at issue in this case — first, has the complainant a right, as a judgment creditor, to maintain this action ?‘ and, second, were four conveyances made by the complainant’s-judgment debtors in April, 1885, to the defendant Edwin C. Swift, executed under such circumstances as entitled a judgment creditor of the grantors to any relief against the deeds ?

That the complainant was at one time a judgment creditor of’ the persons who made the deeds which are assailed is undisputed. He recovered a judgment in the supreme court of this-state, on the 29th day of June,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hernig v. HarrisNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  2. Bankers, C., Ins. Co. v. Henry Henkel, C., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  3. Plotkin v. GalowitzNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API