Legal Opinion

Crim v. Cronkhite

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1857PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motions to settle the question as to which party should recover costs upon the report of the referee in the action. The facts necessary to a correct understanding of the case, sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court

1Opinion of the Court

Balcom, Justice.

The referee has found that the plaintiff labored for the defendant one year, lacking twenty-one days, and that such labor was worth $260.92. He has also found, that the amount of the defendant’s account against the plaintiff, by way of “ payment and counter claim,” was $232.28; and that as a conclusion of law, the plaintiff is entitled to judgment against the defendant, for the sum of $28.64. The report is silent on the question of costs.

The affidavits read on these motions, show that the defendant’s account against the plaintiff, was made while the latter was performing the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lamoure v. CarylNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Fobes v. MeigsNew York Supreme Court · 1829

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Glackin v. ZellerNew York Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Boston Mills v. EullThe Superior Court of New York City · 1869
  3. Gilliland v. CampbellNew York Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Burdick v. HaleNew York Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Underhill v. RushmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API