Legal Opinion

Cloud v. Cloud

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 19, 2015No. 2140378PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Judge.

Although there is no time limitation to file a motion under Rule 60(b)(4), Ala. R. Civ. P., seeking relief from a purportedly void judgment, a party who does not *726appeal from the denial of the motion cannot file a successive Rule 60(b)(4) motion seeking the same relief.

Rickey Lynn Cloud (“the husband”) appeals from the order of the. Cullman Circuit Court (“the trial court”) denying his Rule 60(b)(4)- motion to set aside a protection-from-abuse order entered against him in 1996 in favor of Glenda Sue Cloud (“the wife”).1 We dismiss the appeal.

The wife filed a complaint for a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Full Circle Distribution, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Ex Parte S. Palmer KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Wadsworth v. Markel Ins. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  4. PINKERTON SEC. & INVESTIGATIONS v. ChambleeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  5. Cloud v. CloudCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. K.M.G. v. T.T.T. (Ex parte T.T.T.)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API