Legal Opinion

In re Nadeau

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 25, 2018No. Docket: Jud-17-2PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶1] In May 2017, the Committee on Judicial Responsibility and Disability filed a report with us in our capacity as the Supreme Judicial Court alleging that former York County Probate Judge Robert M.A. Nadeau violated Rule 2.11(A) of the Maine Code of Judicial Conduct1 when he. participated in the parties’ resolution of a case after acknowledging that he would be required to recuse for bias if an evidentia-ry hearing in the matter were necessary. We conclude that Judge Nadeau’s2 conduct constituted a violation of Rule 2.11(A), and we impose a public reprimand.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2] The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MurphySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  2. Timothy G. Dalton v. Sarah H. DaltonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  3. In re J.R. Jr.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  4. In the Matter of Robert M.A. NadeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Children of Crystal G.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  2. In re Crystal G.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  3. Paul Schafer v. Meleah SchaferSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  4. In the Matter of Robert M.A. NadeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API