Commonwealth Ex Rel. Flowers v. Flowers
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
The appellants seek to surcharge the committee of a lunatic. They were unsuccessful in the court below, which unanimously dismissed their exceptions to the account.
Their animadversion to the committee’s conduct in the main arises out of its holding of certain securities, received by it as part of the lunatic’s estate, during a rapid decline in tbeir market price. They argue their contentions as if the rules which apply to the management of trust estates are applicable to the acts of committees in lunacy, and as if it Avas the duty of the committee to convert the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jones v. CableSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Appeal of PriceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Shaffer v. ListSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Davidson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Riebel's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Interboro Bank and Trust Co. AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Gerlach's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Blacho's Estate, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1938
- City National Bank v. H. A. McGinnis Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1947
- Colton Estate, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.