Legal Opinion

Safer v. Government Employees Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 13, 1998PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant has a duty to defend and indemnify the plaintiff in an action entitled Mayerhoff v Safer, pending in the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Index No. 96-00634), the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), dated February 13, 1998, as granted that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for summary judgment declaring that the defendant must defend and indemnify the plaintiff in that action.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Security Mutual Insurance v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Rushing v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Deso v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Quinlan v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Steinberg v. Hermitage InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Sayed v. MacariAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Paul Developers, LLC v. Maryland Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Only Natural, Inc. v. Realm National InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Essex Insurance v. Oakwood Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API