Royal Investment & Development Corp. v. Monty's Air Conditioning Service, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Judge.
A contractor, Royal Investment & Development Corporation, is appealing a summary judgment in favor of Monty’s Air Conditioning Service, Inc. The summary judgment was granted on the ground that paragraph 11.10 of the subcontract agreement required three days written notice before the contractor could terminate the relationship. The subcontractor had filed an action for damages for breach of contract, and the contractor sought a set-off and filed a counterclaim. Monty’s contends that Royal had an absolute obligation, pursuant to paragraph 11.10, to provide three days written notice…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hamilton Const. Co. v. Board of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Mulhern v. MulhernDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Thompson v. CHB, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Gamble v. MillsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burton v. Linotype Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Procter v. Le Val De Loire, Inc.Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1989