Legal Opinion

Geiger v. Kobilka

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1901No. 3916PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Kittitas County. — lion. Fbank H. Rudicin, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hadley., J.

Respondent instituted thi« suit to recover possession of certain personal property which had theretofore been levied upon and seized by the sheriff of Kittitas county under a general execution in favor of appellant. The complaint alleges that respondent is an unmarried man and is not the head of a family, but is by occupation a mechanic, to-wit, a tailor, and works as such for the support of himself; that he has a tailor shop in the city of Ellensburg, where he is now and has been working at his said trade as a tailor in making and repairing…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Auditor v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. State Ex Rel. Stinger v. KrugerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  3. Abbey v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. State ex rel. McKee v. McNeillWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. In Re SmulyanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API