State v. Sanders
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets STATE v. SANDERS 335 Cite as
289 Neb. 335
amount of time,” that Gabriella deserved permanency sooner rather than later, and that Gabriella “needs to get out of the foster care system.” We conclude the juvenile court did not err in finding that termination of Ricardo’s parental rights was in Gabriella’s best interests. CONCLUSION Upon our de novo review, we conclude that the State proved by clear and convincing evidence that Ricardo aban- doned Gabriella and that termination of his parental rights was in Gabriella’s best interests. We reverse the decision of the Court of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Florida v. JLSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. ThalkenNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- Sanders v. FrakesNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. KippleNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. HustonNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. ArmstrongNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.