Legal Opinion · Dissent

Giant Eagle Inc v. Commissioner IRS

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 6, 2016No. 14-3961Published

1DissentHardiman, Circuit Judge

The Court reverses 'the Tax Court’s order after finding that, at the close of the 2006 and 2007 taxable years for which Giant Eagle deducted anticipated fuel-perks! expenses, “all events ha[d] occurred which determine[d] the fact” that it was liable to pay those expenses. 26 U.S.C. § 461(h)(4). Because I believe Giant Eagle’s liabilities were not determined until fuelperks! were redeemed, I respectfully dissent.

I

The law applicable to this case is relatively clear. An accrual method taxpayer need not ascertain the amount of a liability,1 to whom it is owed,2 or when it will be paid3 in order…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Charles Ilfeld Co. v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Joanna Pacitti, a Minor, by Joseph Pacitti, and Stella Pacitti, Her Parents and Guardians v. MacY MacY East, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Hughes Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Cobaugh v. Klick-Lewis, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API