Legal Opinion

Homewood People's Bank v. Heckert

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 1903No. Appeal, No. 47PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, No. 47, Oct. T., 1903, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny County, Feb. T., 1903, No. 326, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Homewood People’s Bank v. William R. Heckert. Assumpsit on a promissory note. The material agreements of the affidavit of defense are set . forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 47, Oct. T., 1903, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny County, Feb. T., 1903, No. 326, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Homewood People’s Bank v. William R. Heckert. Assumpsit on a promissory note. The material agreements of the affidavit of defense are set . forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was order making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam,

The note sued on was an absolute unrestricted promise to pay $3,700 to the order of Thomas Marshall at the Homewood People’s Bank, one month after date. This note was discounted *232by the hank; it was not paid, and the bank brings this suit against the maker. The drawer filed affidavit of defense averring that originally he borrowed from the bank $4,200, and gave a note with the same indorser on the express oral agreement with the bank that he should use the money in the erection of certain buildings, and that it would be renewed from time to time until the buildings were sold; that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Heist v. HartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United Refining Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Gandy v. WeckerlySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Architectural Tile Co. v. McSorleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. United States National Bank v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Thorne v. EdwardsOregon Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API