In re the Estate of Hardy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by the Minneapolis & St. Louis Bailway Company from a judgment of the district court for Freeborn county, Farmer, J., presiding, dismissing its appeal from an order of the probate court appointing Emeline A. Hardy administratrix of the estate of Frank S. Hardy, deceased.
1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.
The probate court of Freeborn county duly appointed the respondent administratrix of the estate of Frank Hardy, and, having duly qualified, she, as administratrix, brought an action under *194the statute (Gen. St. 1878 c. 77, § 2,) against the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Company, to recover damages for the wrongful killing of her intestate. Thereupon the company appealed from the order-appointing respondent administratrix, to the district court, by which the appeal was, in our opinion, rightfully dismissed.
Gen. St. 1878, c. 49, § 14, provides that an appeal from such an order “can only be…
2Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Estate of MayoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
- In Re DuganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Burmeister v. GustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Bell v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- In Re Critchell EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.