Legal Opinion

Higginbotham v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 4, 1976No. CR 76-118PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

Upon convictions for burglary and grand larceny the appellant Higginbotham received two five-year sentences, to run consecutively. For reversal he questions the sufficiency of the State’s proof, the admissibility of a statement made by him, and the trial court’s refusal to submit to the jury the lesser offense of petit larceny.

First, the State’s proof is amply sufficient to support the convictions. On the morning of December 19, 1975, the prosecuting witness, Steve Scobbee, discovered that a pistol and a shotgun were missing from a gun rack in his home. A side door…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. EnochsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  2. Shuffield v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  3. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  5. Taylor v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Richie v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API