Arruda Realty, Inc. v. Doyon
Connecticut Superior Court
1DissentParskey, J.
I cannot agree that the contract in this case does not comply with the provisions of General Statutes § 20-325a (b) (2). The majority opinion finds that the contract does not contain the defendant’s address. I disagree. The agreement is for the sale of 20 Longview Drive, Windsor, Connecticut. An “address” is defined as “the designation of a place . . . where a person or organization may be found or communicated with... a part of such a designation (a street address).” Webster, Third New International Dictionary. Under this definition it could hardly be disputed that 20 Longview Drive is an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Panaroni v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Fisher, Brown & Co. v. FieldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Hatheway v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- Nichols v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1842
- Jarvis v. CunliffeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.