Legal Opinion
Long Lake Energy Corp. v. Public Service Commission
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 29, 1989PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Casey, J.
At issue in this proceeding is respondent’s adoption of an "interim policy” which reflects a substantial change in the implementation of the Federal and State statutes enacted to encourage alternative energy sources in order to reduce dependence on traditional fossil fuels. Pursuant to the Federal legislation—the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (Pub L 95-617) (hereinafter PURPA)—electric utilities are *86required to purchase electricity from qualifying cogeneration and small power production facilities (hereinafter qualifying facilities) in accordance…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re Charles A. Field Delivery Service, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Occidental Chemical Corp. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Long Island Lighting Co. v. Public Sevice CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- Indeck-Yerkes Energy Services, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Schulz v. Lake George Park CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Nathel v. Commissioner of Taxation & FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Coastal Power Production Co. v. New York State Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Multiple Intervenors v. Public Service CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.