Legal Opinion

In re Kenneally

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 3, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney by this Court in 1987 and maintained a law office in the City of Albany.

Respondent has failed to comply with a subpoena duces tecum issued by this Court which directed her to appear on May 28, 2002 for an examination under oath by petitioner and produce relevant files with respect to 23 client inquiries. Re*653spondent has further failed to reply to petitioner’s instant motion to indefinitely suspend respondent from practice pending her compliance with the subpoena (see, 22 NYCRR 806.4 [b]). Under such circumstances, we exercise our discretion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re FarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re AsheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API