Legal Opinion
United States v. Hartman
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided January 10, 1996No. 95-3-CIV-OC-10PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HODGES, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on the United States’ petition to enforce summonses (Doc. 1). The petition was considered by the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to the general order of assignment, who has filed his report (Doc. 9) recommending that the petition be granted and the summonses enforced. The Hartmans, who style themselves as “Non-Consenting Persons,” have filed objections (Doe. 10) to the report, the primary thrust of which is that the payment of income taxes to the United States is voluntary, and they have not consented to make such payments.
Accor…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Robert P. Wilcox v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. RoundtreeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States of America and L. Simmons, Revenue Officer, of Internal Revenue Service v. Alberto E. ArgomanizCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Wayne R. La Mura v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re FlemingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2000