Legal Opinion

Adams v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided February 15, 2023No. 4:21-cv-01300Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION AMY HARP ADAMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 4:21-cv-01300-SGC COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL ) SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION1 The plaintiff, Amy Harp Adams, appeals from the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “Commissioner”) denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). (Doc. 1).2 Adams timely pursued and exhausted her administrative remedies, and the Commissioner’s decision is ripe for review pursuant to 42 U.S.C §§ 405(g) and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Winschel v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Billy D. Crawford v. Comm. of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Christi L. Moore v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Cornelius v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  5. David Sapuppo, Theresa Sapuppo v. Allstate Floridian Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API