Legal Opinion
Clark v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 11, 1954No. 7960PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthews, P. J.
The plaintiff is an attorney at law, practicing his profession in the city of Cincinnati, Ohio, and filed this action on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, whom he alleged were so numerous that it was impracticable to bring them all before the court. The defendants are the city of Cincinnati and its commissioner, whose duties were to administer and enforce the provisions of an ordinance purporting to impose an earned income tax. This action challenges the constitutionality of the ordinance, and the plaintiff’s prayer is that the tax imposed upon him and others similarly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Walters v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Quaker City Cab Co. v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Charleston Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Alderson, State Tax Com'rSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. City of YoungstownOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shapiro v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- City of Springfield v. All American Food Specialists, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re Exemption From Taxation: Chase v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 1967
- Tiefel v. Gilligan, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1973