Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Smith
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. However, in view of respondent’s unblemished record and his lack of intent to harm Mehls, we find that a public reprimand is appropriate. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., dissent.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. HaynesOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Disciplinary Counsel v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.