Legal Opinion

People v. Congdon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1889PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Exceptions from Berrien. (O’Hara, J.) Respondents were convicted of abduction. The' facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This is a very singular case, and the result of the trial in the court below is astonishing, and almost incomprehensible. Gordon Congdon is the grandfather and Desire Rosenbach the mother of Lizzie Austin, a girl about 14 years of age at the time of the trial. *352Charles Bosenbach is the husband of Desire Bosenbach. The defendants were informed against in the circuit court for the county of Berrien, under the statute, for the abduction of the said Lizzie Austin.

Section 9099, How. Stat., reads as follows:

“Every person who willfully, and without lawful authority, shall forcibly or secretly confine…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morrison v. Estate of SessionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Wright v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Johnson v. Grady CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Albring v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API