Pullen v. Moore
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
One of the special grounds of the amended motion for a new trial alleged that the court erred in charging the jury: “If you should believe that there was a contract, and if you believe that the parties have settled this liability, if there was a liability, for attorney’s fees by mutual accord and satisfaction or in money paid and received in settlement of the liability, if there was a liability, then you would return a verdict for the defendant.” A defense of accord and satisfaction must be specially pleaded, and where a defendant fails to so plead, evidence *805tending to show accord and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ingram v. Hilton & Dodge Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
3Cited by2 opinions
- CHASTAIN FINANCE COMPANY v. SherwoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Pin-Har Lumber Products, Inc. v. ReaginCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957