Legal Opinion

Pullen v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 6, 1951No. 33418PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

One of the special grounds of the amended motion for a new trial alleged that the court erred in charging the jury: “If you should believe that there was a contract, and if you believe that the parties have settled this liability, if there was a liability, for attorney’s fees by mutual accord and satisfaction or in money paid and received in settlement of the liability, if there was a liability, then you would return a verdict for the defendant.” A defense of accord and satisfaction must be specially pleaded, and where a defendant fails to so plead, evidence *805tending to show accord and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ingram v. Hilton & Dodge Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. CHASTAIN FINANCE COMPANY v. SherwoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Pin-Har Lumber Products, Inc. v. ReaginCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API