Legal Opinion
People v. La Rocca
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 19, 1975PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Statements made to the police by defendant and one Russell were found to have been voluntary. While defendant’s statements themselves were properly excluded at a trial held after the announcement of the decision in Miranda v Arizona (384 US 436 [June 13, 1966]) for failure of the police to have given the Miranda warnings (Johnson v New Jersey, 384 US 719), the testimony of witnesses whose names defendant had furnished during the course of his interrogation was properly admitted (Michigan v Tucker, 417 US 433; cf. People v…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. La RoccaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981