Legal Opinion

People v. Winfrey

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 22, 2004No. 2-02-1224PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE O’MALLEY

delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendant, Albert S. Winfrey, appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his habeas corpus petition. He contends that, in dismissing his petition, the court improperly treated it as a postconviction petition. We reverse and remand.

Defendant filed a pro se petition for habeas corpus relief. See 735 ILCS 5/10 — 101 et seq. (West 2002). In his petition, he argued that the Department of Corrections (DOC) had revoked his good-conduct credit in violation of the Illinois Administrative Code (20 Ill. Adm. Code § 504.10 et seq. (West 2002))…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Woods v. ColeIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mason v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Mitchell v. Norman James Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. People v. PearsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. People v. GainesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Owens v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. People v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. People v. ColemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. People v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. People v. DychesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API