Legal Opinion

Zoutendyk v. Washington State Patrol

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 5, 1980No. 3927-II; 4426-II; 4330-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petrie, A.C.J.

The common issue in these consolidated appeals is whether or not a state employee who seeks court review of an adverse decision of the Washington State Personnel Board is required to pay the cost of transcribing a record of the Board proceedings as a prerequisite to court review. We hold that the appealing employee is not required to pay for that record either initially as a prerequisite in order to perfect his appeal or ultimately even if he does not prevail in court.

The facts in the case presented by Leonard J. Zoutendyk are typical of the other employees who also raise this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. RoweWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Farm Supply Distributors, Inc. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Gogerty v. Department of InstitutionsWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. Portage Bay-Roanoke Park Community Council v. Shorelines Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pryse v. Yakima School District No. 7Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  2. Zoutendyk v. Washington State PatrolWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Tomlinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  4. Bennett v. Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  5. City of Lake Forest Park v. Shorelines Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API