Legal Opinion

Henry v. City of Newburyport

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 5, 1889PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Tort for filling up flats at a public landing place in Newburyport, and interrupting the plaintiff’s right of drainage upon and across such flats into tide-water. Trial in the Superior Court, before Thompson, J., who, after a verdict for the plaintiff, allowed a bill of exceptions, which, so far as material, appears in the opinion. The case was argued at the bar in November, 1888, and after-wards was submitted on the briefs to all the judges.

1Opinion of the CourtDeyens, J.

Assuming, in the first instance, that the defendant city is responsible for the filling up of the landing place, and that the work done for this purpose is to be treated as the act of its servants, but without so deciding, we proceed to inquire whether any injury has been done to the plaintiff for which she is entitled to a remedy by this action. The plaintiff’s premises, upon which stood a building, consisted partly of ledge and partly of flats that had been filled up, forming a sort of wharf faced with stone towards the water. The rear and one side, which were faced with the stone wall,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Breed v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  2. Attorney General v. Boston & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Butler v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Jubilee Yacht Club v. Gulf Refining Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Concord Manufacturing Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1889
  5. Burke v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API