Legal Opinion

I. & G. N. Ry. Co. v. Folliard

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1886No. Case No. 2036PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Anderson. Tried below before the Hon. F. A. Williams. This was an action by appellee to recover damages for personal injuries.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Anderson. Tried below before the Hon. F. A. Williams. This was an action by appellee to recover damages for personal injuries. The defendant plead a general denial; not guilty; that the defendant had discharged its every duty as a carrier of passengers toward the plaintiff when it put him off in safety at Long Lake Station, and that no damage occurred to plaintiff while defendant owed him any obligation; that another carrier, to wit, an Express Company, and the plaintiff had an arrangement concerning the delivery of plaintiff’s baggage at Long Lake Station, with which defendant…

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.

Appellee being a passenger on appellant’s road, with his gun, going from Palestine to' Long Lake, was carried past the latter station a short distance and put off on the trestle across the Trinity river near its east end and his gun put out on the embankment after the train had crossed to the west end. He walked across the trestle and got his gun, and in crossing back with it his foot slipped and he fell upon the cross-ties and received an injury for which he obtained a verdict and judgment in the court below. ' Appellee testified that, when he approached the train…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hilje v. HettichTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Sherman v. Pullman Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913
  3. Ronald Koons v. Attorney General New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025
  4. Ronald Koons v. Attorney General New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API