Legal Opinion

Whatley v. UNIVERSAL COLLECTION BUREAU, ETC.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided November 13, 1981No. Civ. A. C81-684APublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SHOOB, District Judge.

Defendant Universal Collection Bureau, Inc., has filed, a motion for partial summary judgment in this case brought under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“Act”). Defendant Universal asks this Court to rule, as a matter of law, that:(1) “statutory damages” under the Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(a)(2)(A) are limited to $1,000 per plaintiff; and(2) only the “consumer,” plaintiff Russell Whatley, has standing to sue under the Act.

Plaintiffs have now conceded the correctness of defendant Universal’s first contention. See Harvey v. United Adjusters, 509 F.Supp. 1218,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harvey v. United AdjustersDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1981

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Duane Montgomery v. Huntington Bank and Silver Shadow Recovery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Betty Wright, Cross-Appellee v. Finance Service of Norwalk, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. Riveria v. MAB Collections, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1988
  4. Martinez v. Stern (In Re Martinez)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2001
  5. Conboy v. at & T Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API