Wallis Landes & Co. v. Eichelberger
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Houston County.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Will-son, J.
§ 133. Evidence; exclusion of admissible, not ground for reversal, when. The exclusion of admissible evidence is not ground for reversing the judgment, -when such evidence has been fully supplied on the trial by other evidence, so that it appears no injury could reasonably have resulted to the party who offered it by its exclusion. [WJ & W. Oon. Rep. § 1297.]
§ 134. Damages; measure of, in wrongful issuance of an attachment; actual; injury to credit is not actual. Where goods have been levied upon and sold under an attachment wrongfully issped, a just and fair measure of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wallace & Co. v. FinbergTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Darcy v. John Turner & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1876
- Cook v. WoottersTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Mills v. AsheTexas Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by1 opinion
- Holland v. BeardMississippi Supreme Court · 1881