Legal Opinion

Kakalios v. Mesevich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The affidavits submitted by defendants raise such substantial questions as to plaintiff’s right to the relief demanded in the complaint as to call for the denial of his motion.

The granting of a mandatory injunction pendente lite is justified only where the situation is unusual and where the granting of such relief is essential to maintain the status quo pending the trial of the action. (Moller v. Lincoln Safe Deposit Co., 174 App. Div. 458.) In this case there was no jurisdiction for granting this extraordinary relief. The plaintiff concededly is now employed at an adequate salary.

The orders…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moller v. Lincoln Safe Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. National Education Products, Inc. v. Educational Reading Aids Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  2. Girard Holding Corp. v. HollanderNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Second On Second Café, Inc. v. Hing Sing Trading, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Jonas v. Blansid Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1943
  5. McHugo v. KozakNew York Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API