Legal Opinion

Estate of Hubert v. Comr. of IRS

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 12, 1995No. 94-8287PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge:

On appeal by the Government in this estate tax case, we affirm the United States Tax Court holding that the marital and charitable deductions are to be reduced only by the portion of administration expenses allocated to principal and not by amounts allocated to income. Estate of Otis C. Hubert v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 101 T.C. 314, 1993 WL 414716 (1993). This holding brings us in conflict with the two other circuits which have decided the issue. Estate of Street v. Commissioner, 974 F.2d 723 (6th Cir.1992); Burke v. United States, 994 F.2d 1576…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stone v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Crow v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  3. Estate of Milton S. Wycoff, Deceased, Zions First National Bank v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  4. Estate of Hubert v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  5. Roney v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of HubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Beverly Gardiner Nance v. Iowa Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  3. Estate of Fung v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  4. Beverly Gardiner Nance v. Iowa Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2017
  5. Beverly Gardiner Nance v. Iowa Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API