Legal Opinion

Short v. Borough of Lawrenceville

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 1997No. 729 M.D. Alloc. Dkt. 1996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Commonwealth Court held that respondent was entitled to a hearing on her dismissal as secretary/treasurer of the Borough of Lawrenceville (“Borough”) pursuant to the Local Agency Law, 2 Pa.C.S. § 553, because it wanted to hold the Borough to its personnel manual since respondent relied on the terms of the personnel manual that contained a provision for “due process” in connection with the dismissal of any municipal employee.

Under the Local Agency Law, “[n]o adjudication of a local agency shall be valid as to any party unless he shall…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Werner v. ZazycznySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Stumpp v. Stroudsburg Municipal AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Imdorf v. Public School Employes' Retirement SystemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burger v. Board of School DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Antonini v. Western Beaver Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Olson v. Borough of AvalonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Morningstar v. Mifflin County School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Tyrone Fire Patrol Co. v. Tyrone BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API