Armistead v. Spring
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Armistead and Otto have appealed, in the first of these cases, from a judgment of the Commercial Court, Waits, J., and in the second,.from a judgment of the City Court of New Orleans, Thomas J. Cooley, J.
1Opinion of the CourtBullard, J.
These two cases have been argued together, as the causes of action arise out of the same transaction. The facts are these. R. C. Armistead and J. W. Spring were partners in trade, and about the 1st of January, 1840, Spring sold to Jacob A. Otto, his share in the concern, and Otto became a partner of a new concern, under the firm of Armistead and Otto, successors of Armistead and Spring. In consideration of this transfer, Armistead and Otto gave sundry notes to Spring, and, among others, the one on which Jarvis and Andrews, as endorsers, sued in one of the cases now before the court; and Otto,…
2Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Currie v. WhiteThe Superior Court of New York City · 1869
- John Calder & Co. v. Their CreditorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
- Succession of MagiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901