Legal Opinion
Mulleneaux v. State
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 22, 1997No. 1 CA-CV 96-0286PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.
The Plaintiffs, Gary and Constance Mulleneaux, owned a corporation, Janac, Inc., that solicited funds by telephone on behalf of various organizations, among them, the Arizona Police Athletic Federation. The Phoenix police, alleging a belief that the Plaintiffs were engaged in fraudulent solicitation, executed a search warrant on the business and seized the corporation’s computers, printers, payroll records and office supplies. As a result, Janac was forced to go out of business.
The Plaintiffs assert that the Defendants were not motivated by a sense of duty to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Salerno v. EspinozaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Airport Properties v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Jones v. Salt Lake City Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- Mayer Unified School District v. WinklemanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Allen v. scf/morrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.