Thompson v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, seventh district, borough of Manhattan.
1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.
In so far as the assignments made by the defendant’s employees purport to transfer wages yet to be earned, the argument that they are void as against public policy is very persuasive. In view of the quasi-public character of the defendant corporation; the necessary dependence of the public on the fidelity and alertness of its employees, and the strict supervision exercised over its management by the State, the reasoning which denies assignability to the *103fees and salaries of public officers (Bliss v. Lawrence, 58 N. Y. 442; Bowery Nat. Bank v. Wilson, 122 id. 478) and to the commissions of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bliss v. . LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thompson v. Gimbel Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1911