Legal Opinion
Bourdon v. Canterbury
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 26, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2009-1506PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Jonathan Bourdon and Jeffrey G. Walls, bring this civil action against the defendants in their official capacities as labor union representatives for the Fraternal Order of Police based upon the defendants’ alleged violations of a Collective Bargaining Agreement (“CBA”). See Amended Complaint (“Am. Compl.”) ¶¶ 64-80. Currently before the Court is the motion to dismiss of defendants Mar-cello Muzzatti, Anthony Meely, Norris Mitchell, Gerald Lee, John Beach, and John Bradeomb (collectively, the “defendants”), asserting, among…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Karahalios v. National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1263Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sloan v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Robert W. Wildberger Jr. v. American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio and John N. SturdivantCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hudson, Jr. v. American Federation of Government EmployeesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- In Re American Federation of Government Employees and AFGE Local 1006 v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2024
- Lucas v. American Federation of Government EmployeesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023